Why there is no sidefollowing feature of naviCtrl?

also the limit range of follow me function may be raised little more?

Or is it only me that think in this way?

i 2nd these feature requests

3rd


This will start the limitation discussions again and get H&I angry.. But the justification (apologize) they had was "THE LAW".. but now they started selling 1000m versions for a BUNCH OF MONEY... That means all their justification was a "lie", all was for MONEY... WAS IT? IS IT ?

metalman

sedatozturk meinte

Why there is no sidefollowing feature of naviCtrl?

What is a "sidefollowing" ?

Hi,

I think, following a car at its side.
Not exactly on top of them?


Greetings,

Tom

exactly, sidefollowing a car will be more photographic. So it willl be better to side follow a car or may be frontfollowing... these two features done in a different multirotor platform

HolgerB meinte

sedatozturk meinte

Why there is no sidefollowing feature of naviCtrl?

What is a "sidefollowing" ?

Side following is to follow the follow me unit from its left or right or may be front.This is made by a quadrotor.I have seen this. Why it is not also in MK?

I think it would be better to be able to define a degree, instead of just "sidefollowing".. That way you could shoot from the front, back, 45 deg from the front, and so on

And let's define a path and behaviour.. e.g. :

1) turn around the moving POI with a defined speed between two defined angles... e.g. : 45 - 180 degrees
2) follow a path of panorama through the target (come down from a defined height to a level and go back and agaion and again, whilw turning around
3) 1 and 2 with a sideviewing (or side following)